lkakcaster.blogg.se

“Pre-announcement Sequences in Conversation.” Social Sciences Working Paper No. “Preliminaries to Preliminaries: ‘Can I Ask You a Question?’” Sociological Inquiry. “On Preferences for Agreement and Continuity in Sequences in Conversation,” pp. In Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes,” pp. In Studies in the Organization of Conversation (ed.), J. “Compliment Responses: Notes on the Co-operation in Multiple Constraints,” pp.

Communication and the Evolution of Society. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ĭurkheim, E., 1938. “Speakers' Reportings in Invitational Sequences,” pp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ĭrew, P., 1984. In Structures of Social Action (eds.) by J. “Subsequent Versions of Invitations, Offers, Requests, and Proposals Dealing with Actual Rejection,” pp. New York: Random House.ĭavidson, J., 1984. Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.īok, S., 1978. In contrast to the view that telling lies undermines social cohesion by interfering with trust, this study indicates that many lies are told to affirm affiliation.Ītkinson, J. The negative cases of lies told in rejection of deprecating assessments suggest a broader theoretical template that encompasses the lies told for acceptance as a subset of the interactional preference for social solidarity. The lies found in “pre-acceptance” and “pre-rejection” sequences indicate that both parties contrive for acceptance. The analysis of the general features of the interactions in which lies were embedded showed that many lies are the consequence of a preference system that promotes acceptance and hides rejection in the sequential organization of interaction.

This study of a collection of self-observed lies told in everyday interactions indicated that all informants lied that lying was, generally, an easy and spontaneous activity and that our varied informants told lies in much the same manner and for the same reasons.